PRESS RELEASE:

The Kansas City Missouri Police Department will revise its take-home-car policy and revoke the take-home status of 60 vehicles in response to an internal audit released at today's Board of Police Commissioners' meeting.

 

The Department's Internal Audit Unit does an annual review of take-home cars to determine who is using them, how much fuel they used and whether they are being used according to policy. The last audit, completed in August 2008, revealed a 7.3 percent increase in the take-home fleet from 2007 to 2008. It also showed some of those vehicles had fuel usage that was above the Department average. Auditors began to examine the reasons for the increase and found that the self-reporting process for take-home cars is flawed, and not all vehicles being operated as take-home cars were being properly reported.

 

In response to this audit, Chief James Corwin asked the Internal Audit Unit to physically verify the location of all the department's 1,000-plus vehicles, including bicycles, trailers and specialty vehicles like Tactical Unit tanks. This audit was released at the Board of Police Commissioners' July 9 meeting and is available at www.kcpd.org. Chief Corwin wanted that audit completed before the release of the August 2008 Take-Home Vehicle Audit, which is now available on the department's Web site.

 

In response to both of the audits, Chief Corwin ordered that 60 of the take-home vehicles have their take-home status revoked. This will save an estimated $178,080 to $179,400 a year. He also ordered the policy regarding take-home vehicles to be revised, a task which is now underway. He further has requested a follow-up audit in February 2010 to ensure the reductions in the take-home fleet and conformity to the Department's policy.

 

"I'm grateful to our Internal Audit Unit for seeing that a problem existed with take-home vehicles and doggedly working to find out why," Chief Corwin said. "This is an excellent example of our commitments to be transparent and to be good stewards of taxpayers' money. When we have a problem, we let the public know about it, and we fix it."

 

The full audit report is available take a look

http://www.kcpd.org/kcpd2004/1/Annual%20Take%20Home%20Car%2008-02.pdf

 

Send comments to <mailto:kcpdchiefblog@kcpd.org>kcpdchiefblog@kcpd.org

It would have been nice to have our Chief of Police question the fairness of giving cars to off duty Police rather than finally doing what is right for "economic reasons"

 

 

 

 

 

Ode to a Fallen Comrade

Those who truly knew him honor Craig Davis. His spirit will continue to inspire us long after his passing. He stood tall when most sat idly by. He chose action when most chose to merely observe. His penchant for what was right set him apart from most men. He boldly championed any issue that was right for most and rejected those that benefited only the special few. His way was always forward and always guided by a fundamental set of principles that were in short supply among our elected leaders. There was never any doubt in his mind about what was right and never any reluctance to fight for it. When the facts were known and the issue defined he was always first to say, "I'm ready to go, what can I do to help." He was an essential part of a group of citizen activists who never took a vote; just talked until they reached a consensus made better by his ideas.

Craig was a threat to an arrogant power structure that governs by deceit and guile and whose decisions seem always guided by what's in it for them. He was a threat simply because he wanted nothing for himself and everything for the people. History tells us that people like Craig have always been a threat to bigots and tyrants precisely because they want nothing for themselves.

 He was the living embodiment of an old idea that says, "I shall walk this way but once. Any good thing, therefore, that I can do, let me do it now. Let me not delay or defer it for I shall not pass this way again." He did not delay or defer and those of us who were privileged to know him are all the better for it.

Wef July 06, 2009

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

____________________________________________________________________________

 

 

 

 

 

HELLO ! ! NORTHEAST KANSAS CITY

WHAT IS HIDING IN THE TREES ?

LETS ZOOM IN FOR A LOOK

 

USED TIRES

ONE BLOCK NORTH OF TRUMAN ROAD

 

RIGHT IN THE MIDDLE OF THE CITY

IF YOU TURN AROUND YOU SEE THIS

DUMPED IN AN ALLEY OFF 12 TH

 UNDER TRUMAN ROAD

 

HERE ARE THE EMAILS ON THIS SUBJECT  

-- On Mon, 1/5/09, charles melton wrote:

> From: charles melton address removed

> Subject: Junk Tires

> To: kimberly_randolph@kcmo.org

> Date: Monday, January 5, 2009, 7:59 AM

> Ms. Brooks:

> I spoke to you briefly at The Mayors Economic

Summit about the scrap tire problem and especially

in the third district.  

> Would it be possible for you and a rep of public works

to do a brief tour of your district where I can show

you the problem and also have someone there that can

address the problem? I believe we can accomplish

this in an hour and half tops.  

> Charles Melton    address removed

 

On Wed, 1/7/09, Kimberly Randolph

> From: Kimberly Randolph <Kimberly_Randolph@kcmo.org>

> Subject: Re: Fw: Junk Tires

> To: "charles melton" address removed

> Date: Wednesday, January 7, 2009, 9:10 AM

> -----Inline Attachment Follows-----

> I given Cw Sanders Brooks you request and will

> follow-up as soon as she provides me some information. Based

> on her current schedule the first availability is the last

> week of January or the first week in February.

> Do you have addresses of the areas of concern?

> Thanks, Kimberly

> Kimberly M. Randolph,

> Office of the City Council

> Chief of Staff for Councilwoman Sharon Sanders Brooks

> 816-513-1608 Fax 816-513-1612

> kimberly_randolph@kcmo.org

 

On Wed, 1/7/09, charles melton wrote:

> From: charles melton address removed

> Subject: Re: Fw: Junk Tires

> To: "Kimberly Randolph" <Kimberly_Randolph@kcmo.org>

> Date: Wednesday, January 7, 2009, 9:32 AM

> There is at least ten piles and all are open lots, parks etc where

there is no address

 

-- On Wed, 1/21/09, charles melton address removed

> From: charles melton address removed

> Subject: Tires

> To: stan_harris@kcmo.org

> Date: Wednesday, January 21, 2009, 2:03 PM

> Stan:

>  

> I hope you will get back to me  ASAP about

> this junk tire problem. It has spread citywide and there is

> now a cottage industry of small operators dumping due to the

> increased cost of EPA certified recyclers. There are piles f

> tires in the 3rd, 5th and 6th council districts and I have heard

of one in the 1st, which I have not been able to verify.

> The mess you recently had to clean up at Bannister Mall was

> minor compared to the pictures I gave you this morning. Can

> you have someone in a decision making capacity tour these

> piles with me where I can explain the problem and potential

> remedy? I served on a national Committee through NTDRA

many years ago and having been in the tire business for over 40

> years bring a unique perspective to the issue as both a

community activist and many years in the industry.

>  

> On the issue of payment to Landlords that you were there on I

> served on a committee that Bob Mohart appointed some 10 plus

> years ago and we looked at this issue, We determined then

> that these payments were extra profit for landlords and the

> right of free trash pickup was not a legal right of the

> landlord but the tenants. We proposed that these monies be

> returned to the citizens through a tax credit on their city

> taxes and possible through the state. It was our opinion the

> lawsuits would go away when the profit motive for larger

> landlords were removed. It was our opinion many would not

> file for a credit and the cost of the program would be reduced

by as much as 75 percent  

> Charles Melton address removed phone number removed

_____________________________________________________

MR. MELTON SHOWED PHOTOGRAPHS
OF THESE ILLEGAL DUMP SITES TO
COUNCILPESONS RILEY, SHARP,
BROOKS, CURLS, HERMANN,
JOHNSON and STAN HARRIS.

Photos shown here were taken on Feburary 15th 2009

 

Obviously some of these dump sites
are years old, some quite recent.

MAYBE A LITTLE STIMULUS MONEY
SHOULD BE SPENT HERE.

Of Course Some Folks Would Rather Ask For
Stimulus Money To Fund Regional Light Rail.

On Fri, 1/30/09. charles melton wrote:

> Subject: Meeting

> To: stan_harris@kcmo.org

> Date: Friday, January 30, 2009, 2:41 PM

> To: All Kansas City Elected Officials

> TO: All news Media

> TO: All Citizens of Kansas City

>  

> This week I attended a Neighborhood meeting and finally lost my

> temper. For Two hours I sat and heard citizen after citizen

> tell our solid waste director about problems. Russ Johnson,

> Melba Curls, John Sharp and for a while Cathy Jolly sat and

> listened. They heard this director give out right false

> information and talk down to the citizens and they did not

> say one word. Another example where we are told they want to

> hear but when we speak they close their ears.

>  

> My Message:

> Mr. Mayor you have not done near as bad a job as reported. If you

> remember when Cleaver was elected immediately they jumped on

> him about his vacation. When Barnes was elected they jumped

> on her about privatization of the Water Department. You

> defeated a very popular and honest Black man who even with

> all his good work was not qualified to be Mayor. Immediately

> you had Terry Riley working behind the scenes to make you

> fail. When you approached member of the council about

> changing city manager Terry had all the ammunition he needed

> to start a campaign to discredit you. Francis Semler was not

> the issue it was a campaign because our popular black man

> was not elected and it gave the Star headline material. As

> far as your wife goes not many but most men go to work to

> get away from his. If most men took their wives to work our

> divorce rate would skyrocket to at least 95 per cent of

> all marriages. If your relationship is that good God bless you.

>  

> Ed Ford:

> Ed most of us will never know everything that went on

> however it would be safe to assume from public statements

> that you were pushing light rail in a direction the Mayor

> did not want to go. He had every right to replace you. As

> mayor he needs committee chairmen that will push his agenda

> not yours and he has every right to replace those who wont.

>  

> Cindy Circo: See Ed Ford above however if your allegations against

> the Mayor are correct it is still his right to replace you.

>  

> Wayne Cauthen: You have heard council members in the past few

> weeks call you on the carpet because you are not doing a

> good job. You spent all this money and hired Chuck Eddy the

> man that along with Kay got us in the mess we are in today.

> That alone is grounds for your firing. Be a man RESIGN at

> once. Terry and his crew can no longer save you. As I see it

> you have Ed Ford, Cindy Circo, Terry Riley, Sharon Sanders

> Brooks and Melba Curls in your camp. Unless my math is wrong

> five out of 13 is not enough to save you.

>  

> Council;

> You Must at once fire Wayne and bury the hatchet with the

> Mayor. You have a city to run and you have decisions that

> must be made in the next few months that will affect us for years.

>  

> Budget:

> You heard the first shot fired about coming budget battles

> when Jim Corwin our Police Chief started a Public Relations

> campaign to save his budget. You will read daily in the Star

> others crying about cuts. You must forget your reelection

> and do what is right after all people have short memories

> and most but not all will have forgotten the tough decisions

you had to make.

>  

> Final

> Comments: Terry you have played the race card to many times

> Bury it. Council quit the squabbling and work with the mayor

> for the good of the community. Mayor be bold take us in a

> direction we have needed for many years as far as your wife

> is concerned you know what you have to do to keep peace in

> the family however I cannot see what you gain by this fight.

> You are right it should be your choice and you should not

> fold and run but comprise sometimes is necessary and most

> important for all FIRE Wayne.

>  

> Charles Melton    address removed

 

BILLBOARD OF THE MONTH ONE OF KANSAS CITY'S ASSETS

 

OWNED BY CBS

SIGN # 1371

 

 

 

IS THERE A SAFETY INSPECTION
ON BILLBOARDS?

IF THESE GUYS PAID A DECENT AMOUNT OF TAXES ON BILLBOARDS

THEY WOULD NOT ABANDON THEM LIKE THIS.

A REAL ASSET FOR KANSAS CITY .

 

 

 

 

HELLO ! ! SOUTH KANSAS CITY

I WAS TOLD THAT KEMPER SAID THAT WE COULD
SAVE A MILLION OR TWO WITH CHARGING FOR
TRASH PICKUP AND THEN SPEND SEVERAL MORE
MILLIONS PICKING IT UP OUT OF THE VACANT
LOTS AND RAVINES. LOOKS LIKE HE MAY BE CORRECT.
 

 

LETS START CHARGING PEOPLE FOR TRASH
PICKUP THEN IF YOU DO NOT WISH TO PAY
THEY CAN BRING IT TO SOME PLACE NEAR
AN INTERSTATE AND FLING IT INTO AN
AREAS LIKE THIS FOR FREE.

Former Mayo Kay Waldo Barnes How are you doing?

 

December 10, 2008

 

The Source

<http://thesource.typepad.com/thesource/2008/12/barnes-wants-gsa-post.html>Barnes Wants GSA Post

 

"The Source has learned that former Kansas City Mayor and failed congressional candidate Kay Barnes is seeking a plum job in the Obama administration. Since Barnes is unwilling to move to Washington D.C., that job would be in a federal office in Kansas City. This request brought laughter to the room at a Missouri Democrat Delegation meeting in Washington, D.C. yesterday.

 

Barnes specifically requested a post, as Regional Administrator, in the Heartland Region of GSA. GSA has offices in both the Bannister Complex and the downtown Richard Bollinger Federal Building. GSA's mission is to manage the guts of government. It is an "attention to detail" agency. If any agency is wrong for Kay Barnes, this is it. Barnes has clearly shown that her personal vision blinds her from the impact on running an effective government operation. Kansas City is now facing the scary results of Barnes' mismanagement and poor judgment.

 

The Obama administration should also be wary of previous Barnes administration missteps federal dollars. For instance, Barnes' cronies forgot to file paperwork to get federal funding for the Sprint Arena. And in 2003, Barnes' then newly hired henchman, Steve Glorioso, was a direct player in a mortgage loan scheme that eventually toppled the city's HUD funds contractor. Barnes' record in this regard is clearly tainted.

 

The Source figured we would hear form the former Mayor again. But we assumed it would be as she was appointed to a meaningless board or civic group. The Obama administration giving Barnes a position leading any government office is just a bad idea."

Guest Comment on Red Bridge Project

South K.C. resident and investor Arnold McMann composed this post regarding the proposed monster bridge in Minor Park:

 

On December 2nd I attended the unveiling of the proposed Red Bridge Road project that replaces the historic namesake. The plan is a culmination of almost five years of bitter debate pitting neighbor against neighbor to push through the politically volatile project. The plan to make Red Bridge Road the East-West artery designated by the Major Street Plan is very much in evidence. The right-of-way and bridge is designed for conversion to a four lane road at any time without further public comment. A true Trojan Bridge, where the City's four lane design is decorated like a holiday gift and the failed intersection at Holmes Road receives even more traffic. What is the monetary cost? Estimates are five million dollars to create and defend the design and fifteen million dollars in constructions costs. The current bridge could have been rebuilt for far less at a time when the City is running a deficit budget and bonds are too expensive.

 

It may be of only casual interest that in its infancy the citizens of the area were merely asking for curbs and sidewalks between Holmes Road and Grandview Road. This was documented in the last FOCUS survey the City conducted in 1999 and we still have no plans or budget to build them. The Sixth District City Council members lobbied MoDOT hard to retain a 71 Highway exit to Red Bridge Road, at great additional cost, despite the obvious traffic planning difficulties it presented. It was built to a four lane specification leaving the historic bridge as the last firewall to making Red Bridge Road a highway bypass.

 

The machinations used to first drive the project included traffic counts inflated by major construction on 71 Highway, threats that any delay meant the loss of federal funding and the last refuge of every politician, public safety. When these and other straw issues were refuted, the City's gargantuan bridge plan was withdrawn. During the public outcry, City staff called individuals who opposed the project in public meetings "crackpots" and NIMBYs while mobilizing some citizens to support the project. Those of you who remember the election that followed know the casualties left in its wake.

 

Not to be deterred, the next effort was taken out of Public Works and was carefully orchestrated to deliver a "consensus" decision that met every criteria of the original City project. A public relations firm was contracted to conduct the campaign. An advisory committee was invented where city staff, businesses, development representatives and institutional interests were in clear majority. The city design contractor would not let citizens in attendance speak nor did they make any provisions for them to hear the one-way discussions.

 

Still another contractor was used to put together a "survey" of stakeholders. The survey was created without input from the advisory committee and determined by experts to be a push poll that included selected phone interviews and an arbitrary cutoff. Not surprisingly, the outcome of the survey supported the City agenda. It was the keystone used repeatedly to justify the planned outcome at every venue. The most apparent use of this device was at the Parks and Recreation approval meeting when the board members were also reminded of where their budget was approved.

 

My neighborhood is not the first and will not be the last to fall victim to the development first, neighborhoods last mentality of Kansas City. This process was instructive in how far our governance has left behind those whom it has sworn to serve in order to perpetuate its own interests.

 

LIGHT RAIL KILLED DEAD
maybe the KC Star, Funkhouser, the City Council,
and the "lets build a FIRST CLASS City guys" can ressurect it.

Try calling it a REGIONAL PLAN add bus shelters for North of the river and

commuter rail for south Kansas City and 40 miles of LIGHT RAIL.

 PUT RUS JOHNSON IN CHARGE he is a friend of the people and always helpful with information and truth 

 

 
THIS IS KCMO HOTLINE

.COM

 

SOME SIGNS OF THE TIMES  

 The Following Domain Names are For Sale.

NoOnQuestion1.com

NoOn Question2.com

KCvoter.com

NoIcantAffordit.com

WereGettingScrewd.com

NoNewArena.com

KCArena.com

MetroIssues.com

OFF DUTY DOG PATROL Car is running to keep the dog cool while the officer is making a little extra money as a security guard!

OFF DUTY ?? Making extra money using a free car?

$4.00 A GALLON ??
DOES THE OFFICER PAY FOR THE GAS?? OR DO WE??

 

  

Guarding the blood Bank on Broadway. So I guess there isn't any crime on Broadway right?

 

 

 

Do Not Buy The Kansas City Star

Tell every body you know and every Kansas City Star Advertiser that you do not support a paper that will not correct their mistakes and misstatements.

 

.MARK ESPING IS NOT HAPPY WITH THE KANSAS CITY STAR......... and the way they manage information and manipulate the citizen imput process.

The Kansas City Star has put me off in a very poor manner. They published an editorial statement that was totally incorrect even when compared with their own previous reporting. I asked to have that statement corrected with an "As I See It" column. I submitted 496 words. The requirement is under 500 words. I submitted the following and was called and asked for a photo which was sent, they didn't like that photo so I sent another one. It seems that an egalatarian plan of dispensing Art funds is against the common conclusion of what the Star wants to see develop. In a conversation last week I was told that too much time had passed and so it would most probably not be printed.


submitted to the Kansas City Star for inclusion as an "As I See It" column by Mark Esping on March 10 2008.


The statement which appeared in the Sunday March 9th editorial on regional funding "That plan was hurt by an arts funding plan that wasn't well understood " assumes incorrectly a limited public understanding.

 The public understood precisely that the proposal would hand over hundreds of millions of tax dollars to wealthy "arts advocates" who were self appointed to their official positions.

 The public understood that Hispanic, African-Americans, new immigrants and leaders from our community centers were not included in the planning and that meant little or NO funding for those constituencies.

 The public understood that Missouri law mandates 74+ hours of tax supported art and music education each year for Missouri elementary children and Kansas doesn't.

 The public understood that too many groups in Kansas City, have for too long believed that those who vote do not understand. The vote showed that we understood only too well that an arts dynasty was in the making and the public overwhelming said NO.

 If we are to achieve regional funding for the arts, precise egalitarian guidelines must be included in the ballot proposal. An overwhelming attempt must be made to balance the inequities that exist across county and state lines and parameters must be set which will preclude the development of an arts aristocracy that will in fact, pick what is art for the metro area.

We need arts councils and not-for-profit arts agencies as filters for proposals, but not as the dispensers of public taste or public tax funds. They should function as pass through agencies, with suggestion abilities only.

 

A Kansas City Metro Regional Arts Proposal needs to:

1. Establish an endowment fund where only the interest is used.

 

2. Disperse the interest funds in the form of "pass through" grants to not-for-profits who attach their 990's to their pesonal grant requests and a letter of reference for all individual grants they forward to the individual art fund committee.

 

3. Establish ten designated individual art funds committees, Dance, Exhibitions, Music, Festivals, Folk Arts, Visual Arts, Film, Theater, Ethnic Arts, and Literature each of which would receive 10% of the total funds available. By dividing the funds according to artistic endeavor the diverse citizenry of the Kansas City Metro area will enjoy a diversity of arts programing rather than only the preferences of an elitist group

 

City Council appointment of 4 persons to each art oversight committee with no pay and only a few meetings would avoid arts administration overhead, the largest area of funding in the last proposal.

This system will provide fairness as long as the appointees are changed every couple of years.

This system allows for the inclusion of academic art endeavors and popular arts, it allows for individual and group proposals in our community. Each has a place in Kansas City and each should be provided a chance at any Arts funding that takes place with taxpayer money. The public understands and it will require new assurances before passing a regional art proposal.

 

 

TOP TEN--- NOT ON THE MAYOR'S LIST

1) Billboards-- Non property tax paying billboards, no yearly inspections or safety fees, no excise tax

Institute a building fee that is a % of the total cost
of the billboard just like with residential building permits.  

 

2) Raise Impact Fees--What Impact does each new development project have on the enviroment?

3) Merge the Kansas City Election Board with the Jackson County Election Board--

4) Transfer the Stadium Welfare, to the Arts Hogs --time to pass the 2 Million around.

5)  Put Cordish on a short leash - Quit accepting their excuses and whinning

6) Egalatarian dispersal of any ART & Cultural Tax Racially and Culturally

7)Tax Increment Financing -New taxes must be TIF EXEMPT ---especially Light Rail.  

If they are not TIF exempt, we will simply VOTE NO

8) Raise the water and sewage treatment rates to wholesale and commercial accounts.

Require that they pay their fair share. Especially Johnson County.

9)Institute a national assessor system like Iowa.

Collect on ALL of the assets a business trys to hide.

10) Quit the Police Automobile Loan System to off duty police, particularly for use at some off duty job.

No more "off duty" dog patrol cars running on taxpayer gas.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



 

 


 

-
 

HOW WE PAY THE
BILLS

We get a little help from our friends